{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"TRINITI - Pan-Baltic Law Firm","provider_url":"https:\/\/triniti.1kdigital.com\/lt\/","author_name":"mark","author_url":"https:\/\/triniti.1kdigital.com\/lt\/author\/mark\/","title":"Vieningo ES patento nebus. Bent jau kol kas. - TRINITI - Pan-Baltic Law Firm","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PuLlP1OvFk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/triniti.1kdigital.com\/lt\/insights\/vieningo-es-patento-nebus-bent-jau-kol-kas\/\">Vieningo ES patento nebus. Bent jau kol kas.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/triniti.1kdigital.com\/lt\/insights\/vieningo-es-patento-nebus-bent-jau-kol-kas\/embed\/#?secret=PuLlP1OvFk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Vieningo ES patento nebus. Bent jau kol kas.&#8221; &#8212; TRINITI - Pan-Baltic Law Firm\" data-secret=\"PuLlP1OvFk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/triniti.1kdigital.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/triniti.1kdigital.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/vilija-viesunaite.jpg","thumbnail_width":1309,"thumbnail_height":1309,"description":"&nbsp; \u0160i\u0173 met\u0173 kovo 20 d. Vokietijos Konstitucinis Teismas (the Bundesverfassungsgericht,), paskelb\u0117 ilgai laukt\u0105 sprendim\u0105 byloje d\u0117l Vieningo patent\u0173 teismo susitarimo ratifikavimo. Teismas nusprend\u0117, kad Vokietijos teis\u0117s aktas, kuris ratifikuoja Vieningo patento teismo sutart\u012f, prie\u0161tarauja Vokietijos Konstitucijai, o tai rei\u0161kia, kad Vokietijoje ratifikavimo \u012fstatymas ne\u012fsigalios.&nbsp; Vokietijos dalyvavimas Vieningo patento teismo sistemoje buvo b\u016btina s\u0105lyga jai [&hellip;]"}